Bug 40729 - Support binding constructors as static methods
Summary: Support binding constructors as static methods
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: iOS
Classification: Xamarin
Component: Tools (show other bugs)
Version: master
Hardware: PC Mac OS
: --- enhancement
Target Milestone: Future Cycle (TBD)
Assignee: Bugzilla
URL:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-04-27 12:13 UTC by Rolf Bjarne Kvinge [MSFT]
Modified: 2017-02-28 10:21 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Tags:
Is this bug a regression?: ---
Last known good build:

Notice (2018-05-24): bugzilla.xamarin.com is now in read-only mode.

Please join us on Visual Studio Developer Community and in the Xamarin and Mono organizations on GitHub to continue tracking issues. Bugzilla will remain available for reference in read-only mode. We will continue to work on open Bugzilla bugs, copy them to the new locations as needed for follow-up, and add the new items under Related Links.

Our sincere thanks to everyone who has contributed on this bug tracker over the years. Thanks also for your understanding as we make these adjustments and improvements for the future.


Please create a new report for Bug 40729 on Developer Community or GitHub if you have new information to add and do not yet see a matching new report.

If the latest results still closely match this report, you can use the original description:

  • Export the original title and description: Developer Community HTML or GitHub Markdown
  • Copy the title and description into the new report. Adjust them to be up-to-date if needed.
  • Add your new information.

In special cases on GitHub you might also want the comments: GitHub Markdown with public comments

Related Links:
Status:
CONFIRMED

Description Rolf Bjarne Kvinge [MSFT] 2016-04-27 12:13:43 UTC
Currently when binding constructors it's possible to run into a situation where multiple Objective-C constructors have the same signature in C#, and can thus only one of them can be bound as C# constructor.

The idea would be to add support for adding an attribute to say that a constructor should be bound as a static method instead:

    [Export ("initWithSomething:")]
    [BindAsStatic ("CreateWithSomething")]
    IntPtr Constructor (int something);

that would generate this method:

    public static TheType CraeteWithSomething (int something) {}

instead of the constructor:

    public TheType (int something) {}

Additionally it would be nice to be able to specify that the static method should return an autoreleased IntPtr instead of TheType, since then you can expose it using a manual constructor instead:

    [Export ("initWithSomething:")]
    [BindAsStatic ("CreateWithSomething", ReturnAutoreleasedIntPtr = true)]
    IntPtr Constructor (int something);

which would generate this:


    private static IntPtr CraeteWithSomething (int something) {}

which could be used in a manual binding like this:

    static IntPtr Create (int something, Enum otherArgument)
    {
        if (otherArgument == EnumType.A) {
            return CraeteWithSomething (something);
        } else {
            return CreateWithSomethingElse (something);
        }
    }

    public TheType (int something, Enum otherArgument)
        : base (Create (something, otherArgument))
    {}