Bug 6237 - Code completion includes private code
Summary: Code completion includes private code
Alias: None
Product: Xamarin Studio
Classification: Desktop
Component: C# Binding ()
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC Mac OS
: Normal major
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mike Krüger
Depends on:
Reported: 2012-07-23 08:27 UTC by Alan McGovern
Modified: 2012-10-09 05:56 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Is this bug a regression?: ---
Last known good build:

Notice (2018-05-24): bugzilla.xamarin.com is now in read-only mode.

Please join us on Visual Studio Developer Community and in the Xamarin and Mono organizations on GitHub to continue tracking issues. Bugzilla will remain available for reference in read-only mode. We will continue to work on open Bugzilla bugs, copy them to the new locations as needed for follow-up, and add the new items under Related Links.

Our sincere thanks to everyone who has contributed on this bug tracker over the years. Thanks also for your understanding as we make these adjustments and improvements for the future.

Please create a new report on Developer Community or GitHub with your current version information, steps to reproduce, and relevant error messages or log files if you are hitting an issue that looks similar to this resolved bug and you do not yet see a matching new report.

Related Links:

Description Alan McGovern 2012-07-23 08:27:38 UTC
Try to write some code using XElement. The static members for the XElement type include compiler generated iterators like:


and dozens like it.
Comment 2 Mike Krüger 2012-07-23 09:58:55 UTC
Comment 3 Marek Safar 2012-10-08 09:20:53 UTC
This regressed again!
Comment 4 Mike Krüger 2012-10-09 01:20:32 UTC
XElement. works for me
Comment 5 Mike Krüger 2012-10-09 02:06:10 UTC
btw. I found an issue with namespaces that only contain internal types - but that's unrelated to that one.
Comment 6 Marek Safar 2012-10-09 03:48:01 UTC
still get it with  051279cd2f20497150e08b62e2d011c7245873a1
Comment 7 Alan McGovern 2012-10-09 05:26:40 UTC
marek, now are you triggering the bug? In the same way as the screencast?
Comment 8 Mike Krüger 2012-10-09 05:33:36 UTC
marek -> use case ?
Comment 9 Alan McGovern 2012-10-09 05:36:58 UTC
I can repro it exactly like in the screencast with tip of ui-refresh.
Comment 10 Mike Krüger 2012-10-09 05:56:22 UTC