Bug 4598 - MOBILE profile should provide NetworkStream.ReadTimeout property
Summary: MOBILE profile should provide NetworkStream.ReadTimeout property
Alias: None
Product: Class Libraries
Classification: Mono
Component: System ()
Version: master
Hardware: PC Mac OS
: Normal normal
Target Milestone: Untriaged
Assignee: Bugzilla
Depends on:
Reported: 2012-04-23 13:31 UTC by Jonathan Pryor
Modified: 2012-06-19 17:16 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Is this bug a regression?: ---
Last known good build:

Notice (2018-05-24): bugzilla.xamarin.com is now in read-only mode.

Please join us on Visual Studio Developer Community and in the Xamarin and Mono organizations on GitHub to continue tracking issues. Bugzilla will remain available for reference in read-only mode. We will continue to work on open Bugzilla bugs, copy them to the new locations as needed for follow-up, and add the new items under Related Links.

Our sincere thanks to everyone who has contributed on this bug tracker over the years. Thanks also for your understanding as we make these adjustments and improvements for the future.

Please create a new report on GitHub or Developer Community with your current version information, steps to reproduce, and relevant error messages or log files if you are hitting an issue that looks similar to this resolved bug and you do not yet see a matching new report.

Related Links:

Description Jonathan Pryor 2012-04-23 13:31:41 UTC
The System.Net.Sockets.NetworkStream.ReadTimeout property is not present in the MOBILE profile:


(The !NET_2_1 block removes it.)

It would be useful if NetworkStream.ReadTimeout were present in MonoTouch & Mono for Android.
Comment 2 Miguel de Icaza [MSFT] 2012-04-23 22:48:59 UTC
We should aim at adding APIs to Mobile Profile, as long as it does not introduce a dependency that bloats our executables.

I believe currently this means (a) No System.Configuration and (b) Being careful with both the covariant/contravariant patches in .NET 4 (c) Being careful with the changes to System.Reflection/Type definitions.

But other than that, we should be liberal in what we add to the MOBILE define.   Let us go ahead and include this.
Comment 3 Miguel de Icaza [MSFT] 2012-06-19 17:16:07 UTC